Gen AI usage across teams

Track ChatGPT and Copilot Adoption Side by Side

Get a Demo

Worklytics vs Larridin: How They Measure AI at Work

Worklytics vs Larridin compared: API connectors vs a browser extension, shadow AI, AI cost, mobile coverage and work context, sourced from each vendor.
Worklytics vs Larridin

Worklytics and Larridin both measure how employees use AI at work. They collect data in different ways, so they answer different questions. Larridin installs a browser extension and a desktop app on employee computers, which lets it see AI tools by URL, including ones IT has not approved (source). Worklytics installs nothing on laptops: it connects to the admin APIs of your AI tools and of the systems where work happens (email, calendar, chat, code and HR), so it shows how AI use relates to meetings, focus time, collaboration and delivery.

This page compares the two using Larridin's own public pages, linked next to each claim, and says plainly where each one fits better. For other approaches, see Larridin alternatives.

How Worklytics and Larridin compare

WorklyticsLarridin
How data is collectedRead-only connections to the admin APIs of your AI tools and work systems. An optional proxy pseudonymizes data before it leaves your environment.A browser extension and a desktop app, deployed centrally to employee computers (source).
Installed on employee devicesNothing.Browser extension and desktop app (source).
AI tools coveredChatGPT Enterprise, Codex, Claude, Claude Code, Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot, Gemini, Cursor and more: more than 15 AI tools with an admin or usage API.AI tools used in the browser, detected by URL, including tools IT has not approved (source).
Unapproved (shadow) AISeen only when the tool has an admin or usage API.Detected by URL in covered browsers (source).
ProficiencyAI fluency segments from how often and how deeply people use AI. Prompt and response text is never stored.Offers proficiency scoring (source).
Work contextEmail, calendar, chat, documents, code, Jira and HR data, with history, so AI use sits next to meetings, focus time, collaboration and delivery.Not described on Larridin's FAQ beyond AI tool use.
AI costUsage-based cost for ChatGPT, Codex, Claude, Claude Code and Cursor, by team and per active user.Spend intelligence from billing and usage data (source).
Phones and tabletsIncluded wherever the vendor's admin API records mobile use.Computer-based; iOS is not covered and Android needs a device management proxy (source).
HostingCloud, with the optional pseudonymizing proxy in your own environment.Cloud, or on-premises on Dell or HP appliances (source).

Larridin facts are taken from larridin.com and were checked on November 14, 2026. If anything here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.

How each one collects data

Larridin: software on employee computers

Larridin's FAQ describes a browser extension and a desktop app that IT deploys centrally (source). Because it sits in the browser, it can recognise AI tools by the sites people visit, whether or not the company has approved them. The same FAQ says coverage is computer-based: iOS devices are not covered, and Android needs a device management proxy. Larridin also offers an on-premises option on Dell or HP appliances.

Worklytics: read-only admin APIs, nothing installed

Worklytics connects to the admin and usage APIs that AI vendors provide for enterprise customers, such as OpenAI's Enterprise Compliance and Analytics APIs, Anthropic's admin APIs and Microsoft's Copilot reports. It adds data from the systems where work happens: email, calendar, chat, documents, code repositories, Jira and your HR system. Nothing is installed on laptops or phones, and nothing is written back to your tools.

Personal identifiers are pseudonymized with SHA-256 before analysis, and results are only shown for groups above a minimum size. Prompt and response text is never stored. With the Worklytics proxy, pseudonymization happens before data leaves your environment.

What each one can tell you

Where Larridin is stronger

  • Shadow AI. Browser-level detection finds AI tools that have no admin API and that IT has not approved. Worklytics only sees tools it can connect to through an API.
  • Proficiency scoring. Larridin offers a proficiency score (source). Worklytics groups people into AI fluency segments by how often and how deeply they use AI, without reading what they write.

Where Worklytics is stronger

  • AI next to the real work. Because Worklytics also reads calendar, email, chat, code and HR metadata, it can show how much of the working day involves AI (AI Workflow Penetration) and how AI use changes meetings, focus time, collaboration and delivery.
  • Nothing to deploy. No extension or desktop app to roll out, update or support, and no gap on phones where the vendor's API records mobile use.
  • Depth and cost by team, per tool. Days used, sessions, prompt length, task type and usage-based cost by department and manager for ChatGPT Enterprise, Codex, Claude, Claude Code, Cursor, Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot and Gemini.
  • History and peer benchmarks. Trends from the history your tools already keep, and peer benchmarks for AI adoption (in beta).

Which one fits your situation

  • Choose Larridin if your first priority is finding unapproved AI tools across browsers, and you are able to deploy software to every employee computer.
  • Choose Worklytics if you want nothing installed on employee devices, need to see AI use next to how work actually gets done, or need usage, depth and cost by team across the AI tools you have rolled out.
  • Use both if you need endpoint detection for shadow AI and also want adoption, impact and cost analytics. Some organizations pair an endpoint tool with Worklytics for exactly this reason.

Frequently asked questions

Does Worklytics install anything on employee computers?

No. Worklytics connects to admin and usage APIs only. There is no browser extension, desktop app or device agent.

Can Worklytics detect shadow AI?

Only for tools that have an admin or usage API Worklytics can connect to. Finding AI sites that IT has not approved needs a browser or endpoint agent, which is what Larridin uses.

Does Worklytics track AI token spend?

Yes. Worklytics reports usage-based cost for ChatGPT, Codex, Claude, Claude Code and Cursor, by team and per active user, next to licensed seats. See AI spend tracking across tools.

How many AI tools does Worklytics support?

More than 15, including ChatGPT Enterprise, Codex, Claude, Claude Code, Microsoft 365 Copilot, GitHub Copilot, Gemini and Cursor.

Does Worklytics read employees' prompts?

No. Prompt and response text is never stored. Worklytics keeps lightweight signals such as prompt length and task type, and reports results for groups, never individuals.

Does Larridin cover mobile devices?

According to Larridin's FAQ, its coverage is computer-based: iOS is not covered, and Android coverage needs a device management proxy (source).

Want to see the Worklytics side for your own AI tools? Book a demo or see the AI adoption dashboard.

Request a demo

Schedule a demo with our team to learn how Worklytics can help your organization.

Book a Demo